نمونه سوالات آزمون های کارشناسی ارشد حقوق متون حقوق به زبان (انگلیسی، فرانسه) سال 1402

Directions: Read the following five passages and answer the questions by choosing the best choice (1), (2), (3), or (4). Then mark the correct choice on your answer sheet. Privity is a doctrine of contract law that says contracts are only binding on the parties to a contract and that no third party can enforce the contract or be sued under it. Lack of privity exists when parties have no contractual obligation to one another, thereby eliminating obligations, liabilities, and access to certain rights. Under the doctrine of privity, for example, the tenant of a homeowner cannot sue the former owner of the property for failure to make repairs guaranteed by the land sales contract between seller and buyer as the tenant was not "in privity with the seller. [1] Consider the example in which Shawn signs a contract to sublease a Manhattan one-bedroom condo from a friend, Blake, who leases the unit from its owner Jude. [2] Before entering into a contract with Shawn, Blake had obtained written permission from Jude, the landlord. This permission does not absolve Blake from tenant duties as Jude's tenant as privity still exists between them. Six months into the one-year lease, Shawn threw a large party, and the guests caused $10,000 in damages to the unit. Jude sent the bill for damages to Jessica, and, in response, Blake demanded payment from Shawn. [3] Unfortunately, Shawn vacated the apartment and avoided Blake's attempts to recover for damages and unpaid rent. [4] Since Blake is the original tenant named on the lease, Blake is culpable for any damages to the unit and is responsible for rents due and performing all duties as specified in the original lease. Shawn has no privity with Jude; therefore, Blake must pay Jude for the damages, or take legal action. However, Blake is not defenseless as Blake can sue Shawn since Shawn has privity with Blake.

Directions: Read the following five passages and answer the questions by choosing the best choice (1), (2), (3), or (4). Then mark the correct choice on your answer sheet. Privity is a doctrine of contract law that says contracts are only binding on the parties to a contract and that no third party can enforce the contract or be sued under it. Lack of privity exists when parties have no contractual obligation to one another, thereby eliminating obligations, liabilities, and access to certain rights. Under the doctrine of privity, for example, the tenant of a homeowner cannot sue the former owner of the property for failure to make repairs guaranteed by the land sales contract between seller and buyer as the tenant was not "in privity with the seller. [1] Consider the example in which Shawn signs a contract to sublease a Manhattan one-bedroom condo from a friend, Blake, who leases the unit from its owner Jude. [2] Before entering into a contract with Shawn, Blake had obtained written permission from Jude, the landlord. This permission does not absolve Blake from tenant duties as Jude's tenant as privity still exists between them. Six months into the one-year lease, Shawn threw a large party, and the guests caused $10,000 in damages to the unit. Jude sent the bill for damages to Jessica, and, in response, Blake demanded payment from Shawn. [3] Unfortunately, Shawn vacated the apartment and avoided Blake's attempts to recover for damages and unpaid rent. [4] Since Blake is the original tenant named on the lease, Blake is culpable for any damages to the unit and is responsible for rents due and performing all duties as specified in the original lease. Shawn has no privity with Jude; therefore, Blake must pay Jude for the damages, or take legal action. However, Blake is not defenseless as Blake can sue Shawn since Shawn has privity with Blake.

Directions: Read the following five passages and answer the questions by choosing the best choice (1), (2), (3), or (4). Then mark the correct choice on your answer sheet. Privity is a doctrine of contract law that says contracts are only binding on the parties to a contract and that no third party can enforce the contract or be sued under it. Lack of privity exists when parties have no contractual obligation to one another, thereby eliminating obligations, liabilities, and access to certain rights. Under the doctrine of privity, for example, the tenant of a homeowner cannot sue the former owner of the property for failure to make repairs guaranteed by the land sales contract between seller and buyer as the tenant was not "in privity with the seller. [1] Consider the example in which Shawn signs a contract to sublease a Manhattan one-bedroom condo from a friend, Blake, who leases the unit from its owner Jude. [2] Before entering into a contract with Shawn, Blake had obtained written permission from Jude, the landlord. This permission does not absolve Blake from tenant duties as Jude's tenant as privity still exists between them. Six months into the one-year lease, Shawn threw a large party, and the guests caused $10,000 in damages to the unit. Jude sent the bill for damages to Jessica, and, in response, Blake demanded payment from Shawn. [3] Unfortunately, Shawn vacated the apartment and avoided Blake's attempts to recover for damages and unpaid rent. [4] Since Blake is the original tenant named on the lease, Blake is culpable for any damages to the unit and is responsible for rents due and performing all duties as specified in the original lease. Shawn has no privity with Jude; therefore, Blake must pay Jude for the damages, or take legal action. However, Blake is not defenseless as Blake can sue Shawn since Shawn has privity with Blake.